UKCP member organisation refuses to investigate allegations against therapist

There’s been a new twist in my explorations of the John Smalley case, a bungled fitness for practice hearing by the UK Council for Psychotherapy.

I presented fresh allegations to the Independent Group of Analytical Psychologists, the UKCP member organisation to which he belongs, and invited them to investigate. The response was a resounding “no”. What follows may be yet another salutory tale of the lack of proper regulation of psychotherapists.

The story so far…The UKCP took over three years to investigate complaints about Mr Smalley, a Jungian analyst with the IGAP. At the end of a long sequence of delays, they decided that seven allegations had been proven, but also decided not to sanction him. The fact that he admitted in the hearing that he destroyed his notes doesn’t seem to have prompted a sanction. The UKCP’s laughable response to this is that they didn’t sanction him for destroying his notes because there wasn’t a complaint about destroying his notes.

Of the allegations found proven, one is that he made derogatory comments about other clients to the complainant, including one where he (jokingly, according to Mr Smalley) suggested to the complainant that he hang around after the session because he had an attractive female client coming. Another is that Smalley inappropriately set up two of his clients in a business partnership with each other.

In the UKCP hearing, Smalley claimed to have cleared the inappropriate business relationship with his supervisor, Dr Anne Maguire, who is now sadly deceased. If that’s the case, then this would be a stain on the legacy of an eminent figure in the Jungian community. However, the complainant’s wife submitted a statement claiming that she had spoken to the late Dr Maguire, and she had reported doing nothing of the sort. If that’s the case, then Mr Smalley would not only have lied to the UKCP panel, but slandered Dr Maguire’s reputation in order to try to protect his own.

Continuing the tale…

These differing claims don’t appear to have been looked into. It would be too late now for the UKCP to launch any new investigations into Mr Smalley, because he let his UKCP registration lapse.

Hang on a minute, he’s still a member of the Independent Group of Analytical Psychologists, and still advertising his services on their register. And Dr Maguire was an IGAP member. Surely they can investigate the matter?

Also, there’s the fact that he said in the UKCP hearings that he destroyed his notes. Normally that would be serious professional misconduct, but the UKCP didn’t sanction him for that because, “No complaint was made against the therapist about destroying notes.” (Never mind that there wasn’t a complaint about it, what about the fact that it’s a fitness for practice issue?) Surely IGAP can take a complaint about that?

I sent them an email

Dear Ethics Committee

I am not sure if you are aware of the discussions about the UKCP hearings involving Mr John Smalley that have been taking place on the Not So Big Society website. I would like to draw your attention in particular to this article:

You may note that during the hearings Mr Smalley claimed to have carried out his misconduct with the apparent agreement of the late Dr Anne Maguire. However, he submitted no firm evidence to corroborate this, and others have disputed that Dr Maguire did anything of the sort.

There are two differing accounts of what happened. Are you in a position to investigate this?

Also, you may wish to note that Mr Smalley told the UKCP Panel that he destroyed his notes relating to the case, an act which would normally be considered gross misconduct. Will you investigate that also?

best regards


I got the following reply, which I’m quoting here in its entirety.

This case is now closed. Any further queries can be addressed to the UKCP.

The Ethics Committee

That’s it.

Pitiful, but not surprising. The current complaints system for the UKCP is that a complaint is first heard by the member organisation, and a complainant can appeal to the UKCP if the complaint is rejected. The IGAP website has no information about how to make a complaint, and doesn’t publish their Code of Ethics. I’ve even asked them if I could see the Code of Ethics, but got no joy. They also don’t publicly list any disciplinary sanctions against members, but they’ve admitted that this is because they haven’t sanctioned a registrant for years.  IGAP deemed there was “no case to answer” against Mr Smalley – a decision that the UKCP’s Central Final Appeals Panel found to be “perverse and incorrect”, and eventually the UKCP found seven allegations proven.

The UKCP is currently trying to replace this “two-tier” complaints system with a “single-tier” Central Complaints Process (CCP) that all UKCP registrants will become subject to. The Smalley case is essentially a hybrid of the old and new, in that it first went before the member organisation, and then when the appeal was allowed it was sent to the new CCP.

Not that the Central Complaints Process covered itself in glory either. They took three years to complete the process, and despite seven allegations being found proven, they didn’t think that merited a sanction. Not to mention that they didn’t sanction him for destroying his notes on the entirely technical grounds that the complaint wasn’t about destroyed notes.

I previously asked IGAP whether they intend to implement the CCP, which the UKCP expects to apply to every registrant by the end of 2013. IGAP replied,

Since the UKCP Central Complaints Process is not yet finalised, it is too early to say if IGAP will sign up to it or not, but is likely to do so if it is felt to match our professional standards and has nothing that contradicts our existing Code of Ethics.

They have professional standards?

2 thoughts on “UKCP member organisation refuses to investigate allegations against therapist

  1. Do you think these postings will help UKCP to ever get the idea that the matters they refuse to deal with will come back to them continuously? I do hope so. They cant be surprised that this case has been plastered all over a public website and has come to the attention of many key people within the regulation process including the new regulators. I hope they will continue to consolidated the idea that open honest transparency is the key to their future both for clients and for their membership – and whatever happened to the equality and diversity principles so heavily promoted last year? Please let us know. When the clients are reportedly treated in such an oppressive and shabby way – they cannot be surprised that their potential dirty washing is aired so publicly by people who have apparently (according to this website) been caused distress and pain through a slow complaints process.

  2. IGAP operate like the Freemasons – the rules are not explained to patients and only partially to candidates. They are a completely unethical organisation and deserve to be expelled from the UKCP and the IAAP. The analyst outlined above, John Smalley, is a particularly bad example, but to my personal knowledge he has behaved inappropriately and worse still is a liar. He lied to and about me whilst I was under his supervision, and now he is lying and desecrating the memory of a great lady, Dr. Anne Maguire. IGAP are upholding his reprehensible behaviour. As John is no longer an individual member of the UKCP, they are unable to sanction him personally, but I have already sent them an email requesting that they investigate IGAP with regard to its Complaints and Ethics procedures. These would almost certainly be found wanting. I doubt that they will act on the request of one person, so if you are reading this, agree with it and have any knowledge of breaches of conduct or ethics by IGAP, I urge you to write to them also. (Please do not write under an obvious pseudonym – use your real name, or at least a human sounding first and last name). And yes, I KNOW my name sounds made up but it is in fact my real one, LOL!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s